Sequence Media Group
All about The Network
Featured Video: Family Law FAQ
Follow Us




The Network Blog Roll
Join Our Shows
Annuity News Now Widget
Scottsdale Custom Home Builder

Annuity News Now

The Daily Front Page News For The Legal Broadcast Network

News from the Legal Broadcast Network

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Entries in lawsuit (9)


Is it Sexual Harassment to be Called a "Bitch" in the Workplace?

Can being called a "bitch" in the workplace be classified as sexual harassment?  Paul Mollica, employment lawyer for Outten and Golden, LLP, brings up a case filed against Cook County by a female employee as he talks with The Employment Law Channel.
A woman working for Cook County's Sherrif's Department was promoted to Deputy Director of the Day Reporting Center and for 3 years she, along with other female employees, was harangued by her new supervisor.  Repeatedly being called a "bitch" prompted her to complain and report it.  She was then accused of a work-rule violation that she had been involved in sexual conduct with one of the inmates and she was then suspended.Source:
Paul Mollica says this employee then filed a lawsuit against the county for both the harassment and the violation and she won her trial.  The jury found that she was sexually harrassed by her supervisor and she was awarded a substantial verdict against the county for violation of Federal Law Title 7, which protects employees against discrimination based on sex.
Mollica continues on to say that the judge, after the jury returned its verdict, entered what's known as a judgement as a matter of law, which is a finding by a judge that a plaintiff failed to make her case and disregarded the jury verdict.  The judge then made a judgement awarding the county.  However, the 7th Circuit reversed the judge's decision and said the jury was correct and re-instated at least part of the judgement.
Mollica says that some judges have held over time that the word "bitch" has become so watered down that they are not sexually discriminatory.  What the court said in this case was "we really need to view the word in the context in which it was intended," Mollica says and "is the person in this case being singled out because she's a woman?"
In this case, other evidence gave the use of the word more meaning, such as the word was used only with women and the specific false accusation that she had been involved with a male inmate.  It gave the word even more context that it was used to discriminate because of sex, Mollica notes.
Paul Mollica is counsel for Outten and Golden LLP, a law firm focusing on employment law. For more information on Paul Mollica, click here. Paul’s commentary was hosted by The Employment Law Channel, part of The Legal Broadcast Network.

Poor Technology & Training Leads to Surgical Robot Litigation


Intuitive Surgical is facing multi-district litigation with their da Vinci robotic surgical products.  Dr. Francois Blaudeau, a practicing attorney and gynecological surgeon with The Center for Advanced Gynecological Surgery in Birmingham, Alabama, spoke with The Legal Broadcast Network about the lawsuit facing Intuitive Surgical, as he was one of the first to file a lawsuit with the manufacturer.

Dr. Blaudeau says the robotic surgery was initially developed for the military, to allow them to do things in the field and then the technology grew to the private sector.  Intuitive Surgical came out about 10 years ago and has emerged as a leader in robot technology in civilian operating rooms and really made their mark with radical prostectomy.  After looking at how to apply the technology to other surgeries, they decided to go into hysterectomies.  This was a calculated growth strategy by Intuitive Surgical, as there are about 600,000 hysterectomies performed each year in the U.S.

The marketing material for Intuitive Surgical's robot technology compared it to open laperotomy, with a faster recovery time.  What they didn't compare it to was laparoscopic hysterectomy, which didn't require a robot and this is the basis for the litigation, Dr. Blaudeau says.  In using the robot, certain issues occurred, causing certain complications to occur in numbers not seen before in hysterectomies, Dr. Blaudeau adds.

A lot of Intuitive Surgical's marketing claims have not been backed up by facts.  Dr. Blaudeau says that not only did they over-market their product but they also bullied the hospitals into incorporating robotic technology by creating a sense of fear and loss that if they didn't open a robotic surgery program, they'd be perceived as not as sophisticated in technology.  He adds that they almost created an "arms race" in the operating rooms, that if they didn't go purchase a robot and train their surgeons, that they were going to lose market share.  Dr. Blaudeau points out that just this past month, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology came out with an article about how a lot of the claims Intuitive Surgical made were not backed up by facts.  "We are going to see a real blow-back to the surgical company for over-branding and over-marketing their product line," Dr. Blaudeau said.

Dr. Blaudeau says that the goal of Intuitive Surgical is to get as many cases done as possible because they make money on the cases that are done.  Since this is a whole new way to operate, they had to train the surgeons, so a program was set up to send surgeons to one day, hands-on courses, then come back and be proctored by another surgeon that Intuitive Surgical paid for.  The surgeon being trained would do 2-3 cases and then turned loose, leaving them inadequately trained.  Source:

The technical issues that arose were with the monopolar current, which is an antiquated type of energy.  This type of technology was commercially available to Intuitive Surgical without having to license a newer type of technology, such as ultrasonic or bipolar energy.  Intuitive Surgical would have had to license these technologies from other companies, such as Johnson and Johnson, and in order to get their foot in the robotic surgical market, they made a business decision to just go ahead with the older technology.  With this older technology, however, there was more risk of thermal damage to tissue, causing a long list of complications to occur due to the use of this monopolar energy, Dr. Blaudeau says.

On top of the energy problems, they also had issues with the insulation in the arms of robots. Dr. Blaudeau says that the robots were used 10-15 times before they got swabbed, due to the cost of swabbing.  While tips were changed for each patient, in the course of these 10-15 cases, there was a degredation in the insulation of these arms and injuries would occur that the physician couldn't see as the energy went down the arm into the tip.

One of the big issues with robotic surgery, from a medical standpoint, is you don't get the feedback of tactile sensation, Dr. Blaudeau notes.  A surgeon can tear tissue with a robot, not having a tactile sense and there has to be sufficient training in this regard.  Intuitive Surgical actually develops techniques using their platform and teaching this technique which was endangering patients and causing injuries, he adds.

Frederick Kuykendall, attorney and partner with The Murphy Firm in Baltimore, Maryland, says all of these cases "boil down to who knew what and when."  Kuykendall says that because there were multiple filings against Intuitive Surgical, there may be multi-district litigation, most likely in San Francisco, the home of Intuitive Surgical.  

Kuykendall refers to the first case in the country filed against Intuitive Surgical by Dr. Blaudeau, which was a 43-year-old woman with bleeding and cramping.  The patient had robot surgery and during the surgery, as a direct consequence of the technology, she received a bladder injury which required further surgery.  The patient now suffers from many complications, such as urinal leaking, painful intercourse and intermittent pelvic pain.

Dr. Blaudeau says that other allegations against Intuitive Surgical include that they decided to license other technology but not deploy it and that they knew the technology was unsafe and the training was inadequate.  He also adds that the false advertising and marketing they did, along with direct to consumer marketing, built the momentum of their product, which created a false premise for the patient.

"There should have been a better path to certify the surgeons on these machines but hospitals were so committed to push the envelope once they invested millions of dollars into the program," Dr. Blaudeau says.

For more information on the article in The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, click here. 

Dr. Francois Blaudeau practices gynecological surgery at The Center for Advanced Gynecological Surgery in Birmingham, Alabama and is also a practicing attorney.  Frederick Kuykendall is an attorney in Baltimore, Maryland with The Murphy Firm and is also a featured commentator with The Legal Broadcast Network, providing legal commentary through on-demand videos.


Glaxo and Celebrity Endorsers

Dr. Drew Pinsky, celebrity physician, has received six figures to talk up Wellbutrin, an anti-depressant drug, as a libido booster, something the FDA says is an off-label use of the drug. Source: the government has found no wrongdoing with him, notable plaintiff attorney Jan Schlichtmann says it is time for the country to start dealing with the corrupt process in which drug companies market their products from a policy standpoint.

The $3 billion fraud settlement case against Glaxo Smith Klein, makers of Wellbutrin, brings out the same repeated conduct by drug companies. Glaxo had manipulated test data to hide the truth that there is a tendency of these anti-depressant drugs to induce suicidal ideations to its users.   

When companies pay doctors and scientists to market their drugs, it becomes a corrupt process, according to Jan Schlichtmann .  In turn, the medical professionals see their income as dependent upon the money they receive from the drug company.  "This type of corrupt behavior needs to be stopped, " says Jan.

Jan Schlichtmann is one of the nation's most well-known civil action attorneys, most notably with his work on the Woburn City water supply case.  Visit for more information on Jan Schlichtmann and, where he is a featured legal commentator.

For more information on the Glaxo settlement case, you can read the New York Times article here.


Massachusetts Turnpike Lawsuit Thrown Out

The highest court in Massachusetts has dismissed the class action lawsuit filed by commuters who had objected to polls collected on the Massachusetts Turnpike to pay for the Big Dig Highway Project. 

Jan Schlichtmann, one of the nation's most notable civil action attorney's and featured legal commentator on The Legal Broadcast Network, represents the commuters. 

This ruling has removed hard-earned constitutional protections that prevented cash-strapped government entities from imposing taxes masquerading as fees but really is just another attempt to take money from people.

The taxpayers of Massachusetts were being charged for the expense and debt incurred for building the road but 58 cents from each dollar was being used to pay for the Big Dig Project. As Massachusetts was one of the first states to have paid turnpike systems, they had a surplus in the late 1990's whicwww.businessweek.comh helped for the upkeep and improvements. However, it had run into cash overruns on the Big Dig Project, which escalated to $24 billion. The Massachusetts legislature took the turnpike and combined it with the Big Dig Project and called it one system, which gave them the excuse to collect money for a toll road and Big Dig expense.

Jan Schlichtmann plans on an appeal, as he believes the government cannot make charges on people without the people's consent.  He says that if the government is going to provide a service, the money charged for that service cannot be used for something else.

Visit Jan Schlichtmann's website for more information on him at

For a related story in the Boston Globe, click here.


Judge Clears Texting Woman from Boyfriend's Lawsuit


A New Jersey Superior Court judge ruled today that a woman who sent a text message to her boyfriend while he was driving cannot be held liable for the motor vehicle accident he subsequently caused. The decision stemmed from a 2009 case in which Kyle Best, 19, was responding to a text message from his girlfriend, Shannon Colonna, 19, while he was driving his pickup truck when he crashed into a motorcycle and severely injured David and Linda Kubert.

Judge Eugene Hyman says "The trial judge only addressed the "duty" aspect and didn't address the causation issue."