Chicago Archdiocese Settles Sex Abuse Claim for $1.25 Million. Attorney Eugene Hollander Explains the Case

The Archdiocese of Chicago has paid $1.25 million to settle a lawsuit by a man who alleged that, as a child, he was sexually abused by Daniel McCormack, a former priest and convicted sex offender. The plaintiff was represented by Chicago trial lawyer Eugene Hollander, who discusses the lawsuit in this report.

Eugene Hollander

Eugene Hollander

The victim says that he was repeatedly sexually assaulted by McCormack when he was a fourth and fifth grader. The victim had repressed the memories. What brought them back, Hollander says, was the Jerry Sandusky scandal that broke in 2011. That stirred the victim’s memory, causing him to remember the incidents in his past, and he decided to come forward. Most of McCormack’s victims were at St. Agatha’s School. What makes this case unique, Hollander says, is that the incidents occurred at St. Ailbe Catholic Church, McCormack’s first pastoral assignment.

The sexual abuse has been devastating for the victim. He suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder, and the abuse “has affected every facet of his life.” Hollander relates the victim took opioid drugs to help numb the pain. He had difficulty trusting in God, and he had difficulty trusting authority figures. He had difficulty at his jobs. “There was not part of his life that was left untouched.”

Hollander explains that McCormack’s approach to the boys he abused was to engage in grooming behaviors. He would befriend the boys on the playground, offering them candy and beverages. He would promise to take them to baseball games. “He was a rising star in the Archdiocese of Chicago.” When McCormack took special notice of a boy, the boy would “fall under his spell.” McCormack would use a ploy like asking the boy to try on basketball shorts, to see if the boy would comply. The sexual abuse would progress from that point.

Eugene K. Hollander is a principal in the Law Offices of Eugene K. Hollander, Chicago, Illinois. He has served as a prosecutor with the Cook County State's Attorney's Office, where he successfully prosecuted numerous individuals on the trial and appellate levels. Before opening his own office, Mr. Hollander associated himself with several aggressive litigation firms where he represented a Fortune 500 corporation in the defense of its labor claims, and successfully defended a class action contract claim at trial. He was recently selected as an Illinois Super Lawyer based on a statewide survey of practicing attorneys. The Legal Broadcast Network is a featured network of the Sequence Media Group.

Trains Are Safer Than Cars, and America Needs to Invest in Train Travel: Andrew Breiner

The recent derailment of an Amtrak train that killed eight people and injured 200 has focused attention on what can be done to make train travel safer. But Andrew Breiner of Think Progress says, in his article “Why We Should Spend Billions More On Trains,” that train travel is already safe. He explains his argument for spending more money on Amtrak and our rail system in this report.

Andrew Breiner

Andrew Breiner

Breiner points out that, notwithstanding the crash in Philadelphia, trains are a very safe way to travel. Breiner notes that, while we give a lot of news coverage to the eight deaths in the train crash, “there are dozens of people dying every day on the highway.” Cars are a dangerous way to get around, based on their safety record.

One useful comparison is train travel in the U.S. and train travel in China, where almost a billion people travel by train each year. There was a train crash in 2011 in China that killed 38 people. While it was tragic, it represents a tiny fraction of the people who die daily in car crashes. Part of the reason that China’s train transportation is so safe is that China makes a serious financial investment in train transportation. China is investing $128 billion this year, while the U.S. government is fighting over an investment of $1.4 billion in Amtrak. Congress would like to reduce the Amtrak subsidy.

Breiner says that spending even a portion of what China spends could make dramatic changes in America’s train-riding habits, especially in rural areas where trains run infrequently and are often late. Expanded availability of train service and modern, well-maintained trains might cause more people to think of trains as an important means of transportation. The 30,000 lives lost in automobile crashes each year could be saved.

Increased train travel would also have an effect on the greenhouse gas issue. Cars are a big contributor to fuel emissions nationwide. Trains are already “on the grid,” Breiner explains. Making trains more efficient and putting more people on trains could be a big step forward in reducing emission problems, especially in cities where smog has been a long term problem.

One criticism of train travel is that it loses money and requires subsidies. Breiner counters that “making it profitable shouldn’t necessarily be a goal.” The U.S. spends about $66 million subsidizing people driving cars, but only a fraction of that on train travel. Investing that kind of money in train travel could make a big difference. For Breiner, a perfect transportation world would be one where the U.S. spends some time and attention on figuring out what Amtrak could do with some additional investment.

Andrew Breiner is the Deputy Editor for ThinkProgress' digital team. Prior to joining ThinkProgress, he worked with a progressive media-consulting firm and, before that, an international development foundation. A native of the Washington, D.C., area, Andrew graduated with a B.A. in politics and journalism from New York University in 2010. The Legal Broadcast Network is a featured network of the Sequence Media Group.

Phoenix Prop 104 - New Advocacy Group Is Formed to Support the Transportation Tax Proposal

There are more developments in the ongoing fight in Phoenix, Arizona, about spending billions of dollars on the development of a new transportation system. Voters will be voting in August whether to approve a tax that would spend $33 billion on an expanded light rail system and other transportation improvements. [LBN first reported on this proposal in April.]

In recent days, an advocacy group, Move PHX, was formed to promote passage of the tax measure. The group says it has the support of real estate developers and construction companies. Sixth District Councilman Sal DiCiccio, an outspoken critic of the tax, says that the companies supporting the proposal are precisely the companies who will benefit from its passage.

If the proposition is approved, it would increase city sales tax by 0.7% over the next thirty years. The projection is that the tax would raise $18 billion in revenue. It would be matched by federal grant funds of $15 billion. DiCiccio believes that the money would be better spent on schools. The fate of proposition 104 will be decided on August 25, 2015.

The Legal Broadcast Network is a featured network of the Sequence Media Group.